The intellectual misunderstanding is the cause of inter human civil disputes. The civil minded human brains invented concept of civil law for settlement/resolution of such civil disputes through civil non-violent process of removing intellectual misunderstanding between different human brains. But when civil law based on such concept of human brain fails to settle/resolve such civil disputes, what follows is criminal law in silencing of criminal war between confused minds fought mainly on the basis of physical strength carrying aggressive power. Does such criminal war and its criminal law succeed in removing intellectual misunderstanding is a debatable question?
Socrates was hero of his own time for few human brains and villain of his own time for many human brains and the majority of said many human brains killed him by giving poison. What do we learn from this true history? It is pertinent to note that scientists have their own limitations in exposing scientific truth of Nature to human world and philosophers have their own limitations in explaining such truth to human world. They cannot change all human brains. In this background, the question still remains viz. "Do we need criminal law to understand and follow truth"? -Adv.B.S.More
कोणत्याही टिप्पण्या नाहीत:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा