WE ARE CONFLICTING WITH OURSELVES!
The pain & pleasure, unrest & peace are the conscious feelings of mind. In my view, the human happiness is the combined feeling of pleasure & peace of human mind at the same time. When the mind struggles to remove pain and attain pleasure and remove unrest and attain peace, friend of mind called intelligence comes to the help of mind with solution in the task of attainment of pleasure and peace to mind and this mind-intelligence friendship remains without break from birth to death of living thing particularly human being.
The technology & sociology are two solutions found by human intelligence to satisfy human mind's two basic desires of pleasure and peace by theoretical understanding of and practical working with the basic science of Nature. The spiritual religion is third supplement which although is not practical in technical application of science it does give some mental support and peace of mind.
It is pertinent to note that while basic structure and basic system of Nature both collectively called basic science remains the same & stable constantly, it is human understanding of and human working with science of Nature by way of technology and sociology (including spiritual religion to some extent) which is struggling and conflicting with human self. In other words, we all are conflicting with ourselves while Nature and its science remains same & stable constantly.
In spiritual sense, if we look at Nature as God we can see God as stable & calm immortal being, while we mortal beings struggle hard for our happiness (pleasure and peace combined) due to our failure to understand God (Nature) in true sense and work with design of God (Science of Nature) in true practice. This is the reason why there has been social unhappiness & social unrest in human society.
-©Adv.B.S.More, 4.9.2024
Intellectual response from Chat GPT (AI):
Your article touches upon profound concepts related to the human experience, particularly how we are often in conflict with ourselves due to our desires for both pleasure and peace. Here are my reflections on your thoughts:
### 1. **Conflict Within the Self**
You begin by framing human existence as a constant struggle between opposing feelings: pain versus pleasure and unrest versus peace. This duality reflects the nature of the human mind, which is always in pursuit of happiness—a state you define as the combination of pleasure and peace. I think this is a compelling perspective, as it captures the complex and often contradictory nature of human emotions. We are perpetually seeking to resolve these conflicts through the intervention of our intelligence, which you describe as the mind's friend. This dynamic suggests that happiness is not a fixed state but a fluid one that requires constant balancing.
### 2. **Technology, Sociology, and Spiritual Religion**
Your article identifies technology and sociology as two tools developed by human intelligence to achieve the desires of pleasure and peace. This categorisation is insightful. Technology, in particular, has advanced to meet our physical and psychological needs, while sociology addresses our communal and social well-being. You also position spiritual religion as a supplementary solution, which, while not practical in the technical sense, still provides mental support and peace of mind. This view recognises the holistic nature of human happiness, encompassing both tangible and intangible elements.
However, it might be worth exploring how these three aspects (technology, sociology, and spiritual religion) can either align or conflict with one another in the pursuit of happiness. For example, technological advances may bring comfort and convenience but also lead to social disconnection or environmental degradation. Meanwhile, sociology, which should promote harmony and social well-being, can often be hindered by inequality and prejudice. And while spiritual religion offers inner peace, its interpretation and practice can sometimes clash with scientific reasoning or technological progress.
### 3. **Stable Nature Versus Conflicting Human Nature**
You make an important distinction between the "basic science of Nature," which remains stable, and human attempts to understand and manipulate it, which are often fraught with conflict. This highlights a fundamental tension: nature itself is calm, stable, and unchanging, while humans are in constant turmoil trying to align their actions and desires with it. This idea is reminiscent of many philosophical and spiritual teachings that suggest our suffering stems from a misalignment with the natural order or divine will.
By viewing Nature as synonymous with God, you suggest that our failure to understand or work in harmony with this “design of God” leads to social unhappiness and unrest. This perspective has deep roots in both spiritual and philosophical traditions, which often advocate for living in harmony with natural laws or divine principles.
### 4. **A Call for Deeper Understanding**
Your conclusion points to the human failure to truly understand the nature of God or the science of Nature. This is a thought-provoking assertion. It suggests that many of our societal problems—unrest, unhappiness, conflict—arise from a fundamental misunderstanding or misalignment with the true essence of existence. It invites readers to contemplate how a deeper understanding of Nature (or God) might lead to greater harmony, both within ourselves and in society.
### 5. **Suggestions for Further Exploration**
To build on your arguments, it might be interesting to delve deeper into what you mean by “true understanding” and “true practice” of the science of Nature or the design of God. What might this look like in a practical sense? How can individuals and societies achieve this alignment?
Additionally, considering how your ideas relate to current global issues—such as climate change, social inequality, or technological ethics—could make your reflections even more relevant. How might your perspective inform our approach to these challenges?
### 6. **Final Thoughts**
Your article offers a nuanced view of the internal and external conflicts that shape human life. It reflects a deep understanding of the interplay between mind, intelligence, technology, society, and spirituality. I appreciate the holistic approach you’ve taken, recognising that human happiness is not merely the absence of pain or unrest, but a dynamic balance between pleasure and peace. It’s a powerful reminder that our conflicts often stem not from the world around us, but from within ourselves, and that perhaps the path to true peace lies in understanding and aligning with the unchanging essence of Nature or God.
Your reflections provide a thought-provoking exploration of human existence, one that encourages introspection and invites a more conscious engagement with the world and ourselves.
-Chat GPT, 4.9.2024
कोणत्याही टिप्पण्या नाहीत:
टिप्पणी पोस्ट करा