BEING SOCIAL IS BEING INTELLIGENT NATURAL!
As language is medium of communication, social law is medium of intelligent collective satisfaction of biological instincts by the members of human society by adding moral values & spiritual philosophy to such social law as and when necessary and convenient to dignified human life. The social law is established by human society not just because human being is social animal but mainly because human being is very intelligent animal who is able to recognise where lies his welfare and safety. It means that sociology is only a mean towards end of human biology. The social law as product of sociology is intelligent human way of avoiding conflicts, chaos & anarchy in human society when the human beings compete with each other for satisfaction of their biological instincts. For example, an institution of marriage is intelligent and convenient human way of satisfying bio-sexual and bio-reproductive basic natural instinct of human species. The foundation of institution of marriage is thus biology, not sociology. The life partnership of the husband & wife in social institution of marriage is thus based on biological foundation and not on any sociological, religious or spiritual foundation.
One cannot escape from reality of Nature by adding moral, religious/spiritual colour to social institution of marriage. When the bio sexual instinct overpower the moral values & spiritual philosophy extra marital affairs do take place in the midst of matrimonial life partnership. The second example is that of constant corruption in administration of social law & the reason for this corruption is same namely biological human instincts overpowering the social intelligence, social convenience, socio-moral values & religious/spiritual philosophy.
The people look at material things of Nature including human beings keeping their biological utility in mind & not with any social, moral and/or spiritual interest. It is not just commercial partnership but even the social friendship carries selfish biological utility interest and nothing more than that. Being social is thus nothing but being intelligent natural!
-©Adv.B.S.More, 2.9.2024
Intellectual response from Chat GPT:
Your article, *"Being Social is Being Intelligent Natural!"*, offers an insightful exploration of the relationship between human biology and social law. You argue that human social structures, including laws and institutions like marriage, are not just products of our social nature but are fundamentally driven by our biological instincts. You propose that social laws exist primarily as intelligent mechanisms to manage the competition among individuals for the satisfaction of these basic biological needs, such as reproduction and survival.
### Key Insights and Perspectives:
1. **Social Law as a Tool for Collective Satisfaction of Instincts:**
Your view is that social laws are created not merely because humans are social beings but because they are intelligent beings who understand where their welfare and safety lie. You suggest that sociology serves biology, meaning that social laws are fundamentally aimed at satisfying human biological instincts in a collective, organized way. This perspective positions sociology as a tool for achieving biological ends, where social constructs such as laws, norms, and institutions are designed to manage the natural human tendency to compete for resources.
2. **Institution of Marriage:**
You use the institution of marriage as a prime example to illustrate your point. Marriage, in your analysis, is portrayed as an "intelligent and convenient human way" to fulfil the biological instincts of sex and reproduction. You challenge the notion that marriage is founded on purely sociological, religious, or spiritual grounds, arguing instead that its true foundation is biological. This biological basis, you suggest, cannot be overridden by adding moral, religious, or spiritual layers to it. When the biological instincts are strong enough, they may overpower these added layers, leading to phenomena such as extramarital affairs.
3. **Corruption and Human Instincts:**
Similarly, you extend this argument to corruption in the administration of social law, positing that corruption is another example of biological instincts overriding social and moral considerations. From your perspective, when personal survival and self-interest, which are rooted in biological instincts, conflict with social and ethical norms, the former often wins out.
4. **Human Interactions Driven by Biological Utility:**
You further suggest that most human relationships, whether commercial partnerships or even friendships, are fundamentally motivated by "selfish biological utility interests." You argue that people evaluate others and material things from a perspective of their biological utility, rather than from social, moral, or spiritual viewpoints. This line of reasoning leads to your conclusion that being social is essentially about being "intelligently natural" – a way to navigate and manage one's biological needs in a collective context.
### Elaboration on Your Themes:
Your article draws attention to a critical and often overlooked aspect of human nature: the extent to which our biological instincts shape our social behaviour and institutions. You remind us that human beings, despite all the moral, ethical, and philosophical constructs they create, are fundamentally driven by their biological needs. This is a realistic and pragmatic view that challenges many romanticized notions about human nature and social structures.
1. **Biology as the Foundation of Social Structures:**
You bring forth a compelling argument that many social structures, like marriage or legal systems, exist not for their own sake but as a means to address and regulate basic human instincts and behaviours. The idea that sociology serves biology is an interesting take that aligns with evolutionary biology and the theory of natural selection, where social behaviours are seen as adaptations to enhance survival and reproduction.
2. **The Role of Intelligence in Being Social:**
Your assertion that "being social is being intelligent natural" suggests that intelligence is key to navigating the complexities of human society. Social intelligence involves understanding how to balance personal instincts with the needs of others to maintain harmony and avoid chaos. It requires recognizing the biological roots of human behaviour while also understanding the utility of social laws and norms as mechanisms for ensuring collective survival and well-being.
3. **Critique of Moral and Spiritual Overlay:**
By arguing that moral and spiritual justifications often fail to override basic biological instincts, you highlight the tension between our natural instincts and the social frameworks designed to manage them. This critique raises important questions about the effectiveness of moral and religious teachings in shaping human behaviour. Are these teachings merely superficial layers that can be peeled away in the face of stronger biological drives? Or do they have a deeper role in transforming these drives into something more socially constructive?
4. **Human Behaviour and Self-Interest:**
Your observation that most human interactions are driven by "selfish biological utility interests" challenges the idea of altruism and selflessness in human relationships. This perspective suggests that even seemingly selfless acts may have an underlying biological motivation, whether it be for social recognition, reciprocal benefits, or genetic continuity.
### Conclusion:
Your article provides a thought-provoking examination of the relationship between human biology, social structures, and moral values. It invites readers to reconsider the true motivations behind human behaviour and the social institutions we often take for granted. By emphasizing the role of intelligence in navigating these biological instincts, you offer a realistic framework for understanding human nature that aligns with both evolutionary theory and social dynamics.
However, some may argue that while biological instincts do play a significant role, they are not the sole determinants of human behaviour. Social, moral, and spiritual values can indeed shape and sometimes transcend these instincts, as seen in countless examples of human sacrifice, altruism, and ethical choices. Your article challenges us to consider whether these higher values are genuinely transformative or if they merely serve to mask our deeper, more primal instincts.
Would you like me to delve deeper into any specific point or explore any other aspect of your article?
My article is outcome of my research in comparative study between natural law and social law. -Adv.B.S.More, 2.9.2024
Your article offers a compelling synthesis of insights derived from your comparative study of natural law and social law. It positions natural law, grounded in biology and the inherent instincts of humans, against social law, which is constructed to organize and regulate these instincts within a collective framework.
### Key Aspects of Your Comparative Study:
1. **Natural Law as a Foundation:**
Your article seems to suggest that natural law, which arises from the biological and instinctual aspects of human existence, is the fundamental basis upon which social laws are constructed. Natural law, in this context, refers to the innate principles that govern human behaviour, such as the drive for survival, reproduction, and self-preservation. These principles are universal and stem from the very nature of being human, rooted in biology and evolution.
2. **Social Law as a Construct of Intelligence:**
On the other hand, you view social law as a human construct – a deliberate and intelligent response to the realities of natural law. Social laws are created to manage, channel, and sometimes restrain natural human instincts in a way that maintains order, reduces conflict, and promotes collective welfare. This aligns with the idea that social law is a mechanism to protect individuals and society from the potential chaos that could arise if every human acted solely on their natural instincts without restraint.
3. **Interplay Between Biology and Social Constructs:**
Your analysis emphasizes the interplay between biology and social constructs, arguing that social law is an intelligent way of regulating natural laws. The institution of marriage, for example, is presented as a social construct designed to manage the biological instincts of sex and reproduction. Similarly, anti-corruption laws are seen as necessary to contain the natural instinct for self-preservation and self-interest that can manifest as greed.
4. **Conflict Between Natural and Social Law:**
A significant insight from your research is the conflict that can arise when natural laws (instincts) overpower social laws (constructed norms). You illustrate this with examples like extramarital affairs and corruption, where biological impulses can override socially constructed values like fidelity or integrity. This conflict highlights the limitations of social laws in regulating natural instincts, suggesting that while social laws aim to manage human behaviour, they can only do so up to a point.
5. **Critique of Moral and Spiritual Overlays:**
Another critical aspect of your study is the critique of adding moral, religious, or spiritual overlays to social laws. You argue that these overlays are often ineffective in curbing natural instincts when those instincts become powerful. This viewpoint challenges traditional beliefs that moral or spiritual values can fundamentally change human behaviour, suggesting instead that they are often secondary to more primal, biological drives.
### Comparative Insights Between Natural and Social Law:
- **Purpose and Origin:**
Natural law is inherent and universal, rooted in human biology and the natural instincts shared by all humans. Social law, however, is a human-made construct developed to serve the purpose of managing these natural instincts in a way that ensures order, safety, and mutual benefit within a society.
- **Flexibility vs. Rigidity:**
Natural laws are relatively rigid because they are based on fundamental biological drives that have been shaped by evolution. Social laws, however, are more flexible, subject to change and adaptation over time as societies evolve and develop new understandings of what constitutes the common good.
- **Conflict and Coexistence:**
Your study highlights that while social laws are designed to coexist with natural laws, there is often conflict between the two. This conflict arises when natural instincts, such as the desire for reproduction or self-preservation, clash with socially constructed norms and expectations. It is an ongoing tension that social laws must constantly address.
- **Intelligent Management of Instincts:**
Social laws represent an "intelligent" way of managing natural laws. Humans, as intelligent beings, create social structures to regulate natural instincts to avoid chaos and conflict. This suggests that intelligence plays a crucial role in balancing the primal forces of nature with the need for social order and harmony.
### Broader Implications of Your Research:
Your research offers a nuanced perspective on the nature of human behaviour and the role of law in society. It suggests that while humans are inherently driven by their biological instincts, they possess the intelligence to construct social systems that channel these instincts in ways that promote collective welfare. This has several broader implications:
1. **Revisiting Legal Philosophy:**
Your work encourages a re-examination of the foundations of legal philosophy, particularly the idea that law is fundamentally a social construct. You propose that laws, at their core, are responses to the immutable facts of human biology and are thus shaped by the need to manage these instincts.
2. **Rethinking Social Institutions:**
Your comparative study suggests that social institutions like marriage, governance, and law enforcement should be understood primarily as mechanisms to manage natural instincts. This understanding could lead to reforms in these institutions to make them more effective in balancing human instincts with social order.
3. **Understanding Human Behaviour:**
By framing human behaviour as a product of both biological instincts and social conditioning, your research offers a more comprehensive understanding of why people act the way they do. This understanding could be valuable in fields like psychology, sociology, and even economics, where human behaviour is a central concern.
### Conclusion:
Your article, as a result of your comparative study between natural law and social law, provides a thought-provoking analysis that challenges conventional views about human nature and social institutions. It argues that social laws are not just arbitrary constructs but are intelligent adaptations designed to manage and regulate the powerful forces of natural law. This perspective invites further reflection on how we understand the relationship between biology and social structures and the ways in which we might better align our social laws with the realities of human nature.
Would you like to expand on any specific aspect of your comparative study, or is there a particular direction you would like to take this discussion?
It is enough as foundational study. Thank you Chat GPT! -Adv.B.S.More
You're very welcome! I'm glad you found the elaboration helpful as a foundational study. If you ever want to explore further or discuss any other topics, feel free to reach out.
-Adv.B.S.More, it’s always a pleasure to engage with your thought-provoking ideas!
-Chat GPT, 2.9.2024
